Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Your Brain on Ebooks: Is Retention and Comprehension the Same as for Print Resources?


The online environment "promotes cursory reading, hurried and distracted thinking, and superficial learning," argues Nicholas Carr, who raises concerns about the long-term implications in The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brain, which was published in June. "The danger is you don't encourage people to think critically and, ultimately, you don't encourage them to think creatively." (Marklein, 2010, More May Not Be Better section, para. 2)

            There are surprisingly few research studies examining the difference in comprehension and retention when reading in print versus electronic formats. This may be due to the relatively recent explosion in digital reading options and adoption by the public. It also appears that many studies looking at the impact of this technology are currently taking place, although findings have not been published. However, available research paints a mixed, if not wary, picture of the role of eBooks in learning.

            Not all eBooks are created equal. Some electronic resources include only the text in digital form. Other eBooks include bells and whistles like hyperlinks, videos, animation, sound and music. According to Marklein (2010, More May Not Be Better, para. 1), a 2005 review by researchers at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, of 38 studies found "very little support" for the idea that all those links to additional information enrich the reader's experience. A 2007 study published in Media Psychology raised similar concerns about add-ons such as sound and animation.

            Distraction is often cited as one of the main hurdles when using eBooks. The options in eBooks can pull readers away from the text, not to mention the availability of the Internet at large, in most formats. As distractions increase, the opportunity for deep understanding decreases.“The attention span of children may be one of the main reasons why an immersion in on-screen reading is so engaging, and it may also be why digital reading may ultimately prove antithetical to the long-in-development, reflective nature of the expert reading brain as we know it.” (Wolf, 2009, Beyond Decoding Words section, para. 9)

            Print resources have a “spatial advantage” over electronic formats, according to Jones (2010). Information is organized in books in a fixed way that is easy to find again. Readers remember the location of a fact or quote by where it appears on the printed page. Electronic texts have pages that look the same, making retrieval more difficult.

            Gelernter (2009, The Book Made Better, para. 5) talks about another problem with electronic resources, the cheapening of the word.  “…you can practically see the text messages buzz around the room and bounce off the walls, each as memorable as a housefly; where the narrowing time between writing for and publishing on the Web is helping to kill the art of editing by crushing it to death. The Internet makes words as cheap and as significant as Cheese Doodles. The tools (as usual) are neutral. It’s up to us to insist that onscreen reading enhance, not replace, traditional book reading. It’s up to us to remember that the medium is not the message; that the meaning and music of the words is what matters, not the glitzy vehicle they arrive in.”

            Clearly, the jury is still out on eBooks and learning. It will be interesting to see what impacts and advantages become apparent as we examine eBooks from a future vantage point.



Jones, John. (2010) Ebooks and learning. Retrieved from http://www.dmlcentral.net/blog/john-jones/ebooks-and-learning


Liu, A., Aamodt, S., Wolf, M., Gelernter, D. & Mark, G. (2009, October 14) Does the brain like ebooks? The New York Times Retrieved from http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/14/does-the-brain-like-e-books/


Marklein, Mary Beth. (2010, August 10) Can college students learn as well on iPads, ebooks? USA Today Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2010-08-10-ebooklearning10_CV_N.htm












8 comments:

  1. This is really interesting! I know that I personally feel like I retain more information when I can see something in print form. For school, I am constantly printing things off: rubrics, powerpoints, assignment descriptions, etc. I know that you can buy many textbooks now as e-books and I just think that it would be so difficult to stay on task and comprehend the information. I am glad to see that I am not the only person that is like this! This is great that there is actual research on this topic. I think a lot of people love everything to be tech-savvy, but you must admit there is a little magic in actually opening and turning the pages in a print book (and much less distractions).

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel the same way. It is good that "digital natives," who grew up with computers, feel so comfortable reading in this form. However, the level of comprehension may suffer. I was interested to find so much research in this area, since it is something I often think about.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that the information about the spatial advantage of print is very interesting. I think books also provide a certain tactile experience that is really missing with an e-reader-- it sounds strange, but I don't like how an e-reader looks and feels the same to me no matter how far along I am in my book. With a paper book, the left side gets bigger as I read, and I like being able to see my progress at a glance. It's odd how even the most trivial detail can so fundamentally change the reading process.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like it isn't just me! I found an interesting paper about one possible future for e-books (as a platform for content management, rather than simply as an extension to the traditional publishing model), and it touched a bit on some of the disadvantages of e-books, which included the lack of "haptic feedback." The paper also pointed out that people tend to thumb through a book quickly when deciding whether to purchase it, something you obviously can't do as easily with an e-book. Turns out that these trivial details aren't actually that trivial.

      Source:

      Roa, S.S. (2003). Electronic Books: A New Genre of Content Management. Retrieved April 12, 2012 from http://www.saoug.org.za/archive/2003/0306.pdf

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the extra info Stephanie! - Sara Magnuson

      Delete
    3. I have not researched this topic,but I would argue "there is a time and place for everything". I understand we have to be abreast of new developments and embrace it at times. Our brains has become accustomed to knowing/understanding "opening a book" means concentration and indulge in the writing. eBook are on the devices we play games, surf the Internet, and so on. Psychologically I dont think our brain is completely "there". We have the option to stop and browse. Even if it was sanitary I don't think we would really enjoy eating our meal off our ipads. eBook are in such an early stage; our brains have grasped this new concept. There are so many worldy factors that sdevelopment.

      Delete
  4. From Sara Magnuson:
    This post provided lots of useful information for me as a youth parapro. I can talk until I'm blue in the face about the importance of reading aloud to a child, sharing books together, talking about illustrations. If I don't have hard data as to why the TV and computer can't do this job for them, parents just shrug it off. Your info on spatial placement is great "thought fodder" - throw it our there that we remember things by where they are physically located and e-books affect our recall. Spatial awareness skills are on the decline with the lack of outdoor play, less competitive sports, less rough housing. Too much screen time affects critical thinking skills no matter how old you are. I will definitely be throwing out these info bits to parents.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree that some important skills are being lost for kids as they have less unstructured play time, more screen time, etc. It is all part of the same cultural shift and I wish there was a bit more questioning of the trends and wondering about the overall value. The more we are armed with tidbits to share, the better! :)

    ReplyDelete